PHIL 1010 Discussion Radical Skepticism

March 8, 2022
Want your Assignment Done? Order NOw you can do it easy.

PHIL 1010 Discussion Radical Skepticism

PHIL 1010 Discussion Radical Skepticism

Question Description
I need an explanation for this Philosophy question to help me study.

Since the time of ancient Greek philosophers such as Carneades, Pyrrho, and Sextus Empiricus, some thinkers have claimed that some version of skepticism about knowledge is true. Others have rejected such skepticism. One version of radical skepticism about knowledge is the claim that human beings cannot obtain knowledge about anything whatsoever. Do you agree with this view? Why or why not?

Radical skepticism (or radical scepticism in British English) is the philosophical position that knowledge is most likely impossible.[1] Radical skeptics hold that doubt exists as to the veracity of every belief and that certainty is therefore never justified. To determine the extent to which it is possible to respond to radical skeptical challenges is the task of epistemology or “the theory of knowledge”.[2]

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: PHIL 1010 Discussion Radical Skepticism

Several Ancient Greek philosophers, including Plato, Cratylus, Pyrrho, Arcesilaus, Carneades, Aenesidemus, Agrippa the Skeptic, and Sextus Empiricus have been viewed as having expounded radically skeptic positions. Three of the Hellenistic philosophies held radically skeptic views: Pyrrhonism, Academic Skepticism, and Cyrenaicism. In ancient Greek the radical skeptical view was termed acatalepsy, denoting the ungraspablity of knowledge.

In modern philosophy, two representatives of radical skepticism are Michel de Montaigne (most famously known for his skeptical remark, Que sçay-je ?, ‘What do I know?’ in Middle French; modern French Que sais-je ?) and David Hume (particularly as set out in A Treatise of Human Nature, Book 1: “Of the Understanding”).

As radical skepticism can be used as an objection for most or all beliefs, many philosophers have attempted to refute it. For example, Bertrand Russell wrote “Skepticism, while logically impeccable, is psychologically impossible, and there is an element of frivolous insincerity in any philosophy which pretends to accept it.”[3]

Radical scepticism, however, should also be in doubt of itself; that, or affirm itself. Affirmation then puts an end to scepticism. Ergo: scepticism cannot be maintained.

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.
Posted in nursing by Clarissa