NUR 630 Wk 4 CLC – Quality Models Assignment

March 1, 2022

NUR 630 Wk 4 CLC – Quality Models Assignment

NUR 630 Wk 4 CLC – Quality Models Assignment

NUR 630 Wk 4 CLC – Quality Models Assignment

Assessment Description

This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment.

The purpose of this assignment is to examine quality models used in health care. With your CLC group, create a 12-15 slide PowerPoint on Lean, Six Sigma, and 5S quality models. Include the following in your presentation:

  1. A description of each quality model.
  2. A brief history of each quality model.
  3. A description and examples of how each quality model can be applied to the health care setting.
  4. Include a title slide, references slide, and comprehensive speaker notes.
  5. Use a minimum of four peer-reviewed, scholarly references as evidence.

Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Resources

Washington Manual of Patient Safety and Quality Improvement

Read Chapter 5 in Washington Manual of Patient Safety and Quality Improvement.


Using Lean Six Sigma to Increase the Effectiveness of an Evidence-Based Quality Improvement Program

Read “Using Lean Six Sigma to Increase the Effectiveness of an Evidence-Based Quality Improvement Program,” by Lavin and Vet

… 


Following Lean and the 5S Philosophy Can Make Quality Improvement Sustainable

Read “Following Lean and the 5S Philosophy Can Make Quality Improvement Sustainable,” from Same-Day Surgery (2020).

… 


Module 4. Approaches to Quality Improvement

Read “Module 4. Approaches to Quality Improvement,” from the Practice Facilitation Handbook (2013), located on the Agenc

… 


Continuous Quality Improvement in Health Care

Read Chapter 5 in Continuous Quality Improvement in Health Care.


Decreasing Wait Times and Increasing Patient Satisfaction: A Lean Six Sigma Approach

Read “Decreasing Wait Times and Increasing Patient Satisfaction: A Lean Six Sigma Approach,” by Godley and Jenkins, from Jour

… 

CLC – Quality Models – Rubric

Description of Each Model

Criteria Description

Description of Each Model

5. Target

12 points

A description of each quality model is present and thorough.

4. Acceptable

11.04 points

A description of each quality model is present and detailed.

3. Approaching

10.56 points

A description of each quality model is present.

2. Insufficient

9.6 points

A description of each quality model is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description of each quality model is not present.

Brief History of Each Model

Criteria Description

Brief History of Each Model

5. Target

13 points

A brief history of each quality model is present and thorough.

4. Acceptable

11.96 points

A brief history of each quality model is present and detailed.

3. Approaching

11.44 points

A brief history of each quality model is present.

2. Insufficient

10.4 points

A brief history of each quality model is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.

NUR 630 Wk 4 CLC – Quality Models Assignment

NUR 630 Wk 4 CLC – Quality Models Assignment

A description and examples of how each quality model Can be Applied to the Health Care Setting

Criteria Description

A description and examples of how each quality model Can be Applied to the Health Care Setting

5. Target

15 points

A description and examples of how each quality model can be applied to the health care setting is present and thorough.

4. Acceptable

13.8 points

A description and examples of how each quality model can be applied to the health care setting is present and detailed.

3. Approaching

13.2 points

A description and examples of how each quality model can be applied to the health care setting is present.

2. Insufficient

12 points

A description and examples of how each quality model can be applied to the health care setting is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description and examples of how each quality model can be applied to the health care setting is not present.

Presentation of Content

Criteria Description

Presentation of Content

5. Target

30 points

The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.

4. Acceptable

27.6 points

The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.

3. Approaching

26.4 points

The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other.

2. Insufficient

24 points

The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.

Layout

Criteria Description

Layout

5. Target

10 points

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

4. Acceptable

9.2 points

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.

3. Approaching

8.8 points

The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.

2. Insufficient

8 points

The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

Language Use and Audience Awareness

Criteria Description

Includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.

5. Target

10 points

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.

4. Acceptable

9.2 points

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.

3. Approaching

8.8 points

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.

2. Insufficient

8 points

Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.

Mechanics of Writing