NUR 621 Value-Based Purchasing Presentation

March 6, 2022

NUR 621 Value-Based Purchasing Presentation

NUR 621 Value-Based Purchasing Presentation

https://www.allnursingessays.com/nur-621-value-based-purchasing-presentation/

Value-Based Care Description

ØValue-Based care substantially in the clinical setting increases performance

ØValue-Based purchasing process efficiency or pay for performance in the health administration

ØIntegrated Systems for delivery increases value-based care for patients

Ø Aligning Value- based care with efficiency to create value for patient care

The payment model that provides financial incentives to hospitals, physicians, healthcare providers, and other medical groups for gaining certain measure of performance is known as Value-Based Purchasing or Pay for Performance(P4P). Clinical results, like long survival, are hard to measure, thus making value-based purchasing process efficient and quality for evaluation process. Things like lowering blood pressure, measuring blood pressure, or even advising patients to avoid smoking. This work scheme also penalizes medical and health care workers for medical professional errors, poor results, or even increased costs. The introduction of  the integrated systems for delivery whereby, the providers and the insurers cost share to help in aligning motivation  for value-based care ( Bosko,Dubow,Koenig, 2016).

NUR 621 Value-Based Purchasing Presentation

Scenario: You work in the contracting department of a national payer that is converting its provider contracts to value-based arrangements. Your team is attempting to recontract with large physician groups. In NUR 621 Value-Based Purchasing Presentation, create a 12- to 15-slide presentation with speaker notes to demonstrate the benefits of converting to a value-based arrangement:

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT

Describe value-based care.

Describe how value-based care differs from fee-for-service or capitated care.

Explain why adopting a value-based purchasing arrangement would be financially beneficial to both physician groups and the health plan.

Include at least three references, one of which should be your textbook.

 

Prepare this assignment in accordance with the APA Style Guide, which can be found in the Student Success Center.

 

This assignment makes use of a rubric. Please review the rubric before beginning the assignment to become acquainted with the requirements for successful completion.

 

You must turn in this assignment to LopesWrite. If you require assistance, a link to the LopesWrite technical support articles can be found in Class Resources.

Value-Based Purchasing Presentation – Rubric

Value-Based Care

Criteria Description

Value-Based Care

5. Target

16 points

The presentation explains value-based care in a substantial and thought-provoking manner.

4. Acceptable

14.72 points

The presentation explains value-based care in a substantial manner.

3. Approaching

14.08 points

The presentation clearly explains value-based care.

2. Insufficient

12.8 points

The presentation vaguely explains value-based care.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The presentation does not sufficiently explain value-based care.

Differences in Value-Based Care

Criteria Description

Differences in Value-Based Care

5. Target

16 points

The presentation explains how value-based care differs from a fee-for-service or a capitated approach in a substantial and thought-provoking manner.

4. Acceptable

14.72 points

The presentation explains how value-based care differs from a fee-for-service or a capitated approach in a substantial manner.

3. Approaching

14.08 points

The presentation clearly explains how value-based care differs from a fee-for-service or a capitated approach.

2. Insufficient

12.8 points

The presentation vaguely explains how value-based care differs from a fee-for-service or a capitated approach.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The presentation does not sufficiently explain how value-based care differs from a fee-for-service or a capitated approach.

Financial Advantages to Value-Based Purchasing

Criteria Description

Financial Advantages to Value-Based Purchasing

5. Target

16 points

The presentation thoroughly and substantially describes why adopting a value-based purchasing arrangement would be financially advantageous for the physician groups and to the health plan.

4. Acceptable

14.72 points

The presentation thoroughly describes why adopting a value-based purchasing arrangement would be financially advantageous for the physician groups and to the health plan.

3. Approaching

14.08 points

The presentation clearly describes why adopting a value-based purchasing arrangement would be financially advantageous for the physician groups and to the health plan.

2. Insufficient

12.8 points

The presentation vaguely describes why adopting a value-based purchasing arrangement would be financially advantageous for the physician groups and to the health plan.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The presentation does not sufficiently describe why adopting a value-based purchasing arrangement would be financially advantageous for the physician groups and to the health plan.

Presentation of Content

Criteria Description

Presentation of Content

5. Target

8 points

The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.

4. Acceptable

7.36 points

The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.

3. Approaching

7.04 points

The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other.

2. Insufficient

6.4 points

The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.

Layout

Criteria Description

Layout

5. Target

8 points

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

4. Acceptable

7.36 points

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.

3. Approaching

7.04 points

The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.

2. Insufficient

6.4 points

The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

Language Use and Audience Awareness

Criteria Description

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)

5. Target

8 points

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.

4. Acceptable

7.36 points

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.

3. Approaching

7.04 points

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.

2. Insufficient

6.4 points

Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.

Mechanics of Writing

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Target

4 points

Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.

4. Acceptable

3.68 points

Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.

3. Approaching

3.52 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader.

2. Insufficient

3.2 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

Documentation of Sources

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Target

4 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Acceptable

3.68 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. Approaching

3.52 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. Insufficient

3.2 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

Total 80 points

Resources

Economics and Financial Management for Nurses and Nurse Leaders

Read the section, “ACOs Compared With MCOs,” of Chapter 3 and review the section, “ACA Timeline,” of Chapter 2

…