NUR 550 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final Paper
NUR 550 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final Paper
NUR 550 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final Paper
https://allnursingessays.com/nur-550-benchmark-evidence-based-practice-project-proposal-final-paper/
Evaluation Plan
Expected Outcomes
Reduction in the rate of medication administration errors is one of the expected project outcomes. Integrated health information technology is effective in facilitating the reduction of medication errors in nursing practice as seen from Ratwani et al. (2018) and Alotaibi and Federico (2017)’s studies. It is also expected that the costs of care incurred by critically ill patients will reduce due to minimization of medication errors (Bolandianbafghi et al., 2017). Lastly, it is expected that the integrated systems will be used consistently to sustain improvements in medication administration errors in the organization.
Click here to ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT ON NUR 550 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final Paper
Data Collection Tool
Questionnaires would be used for collecting data for the project. Questionnaires will facilitate the acquisition of broad data about the project’s effectiveness from the participants. Questionnaires are also highly valid and reliable. The reliability can be seen from their ability to measure similar variables in a consistent manner across the participants of the project. The validity of questionnaires is seen from the fact that they can accurately measure the intended outcomes of the project. They also provide data that reflects the true experiences or perceptions of the participants. The applicability of questionnaires for the project is seen from its use in scientific studies, including nursing (Gray & Grove, 2020).
Statistical Test
T-test will be used in the project. T-test refers to a statistical computation that compares the mean of two samples. T-test will be used since it is expected that the mean and standard deviation of the population data may be unknown. Besides, it is appropriate for the project as it will provide an accurate picture of the effectiveness of the intervention pre and post-interventional phases (LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, 2018). It will also provide a true picture of the effect size of the intervention.
Methods
Data will be checked for completeness and accuracy. The completeness of data is important to facilitate easy analysis. Data extraction, coding, and analysis will also be done to determine the effectiveness of the project. Data interpretation will then be made to develop conclusions on the effectiveness of the intervention.
Strategies if Outcomes do not Provide Positive or Expected Results
The project is implemented with the aim of achieving its outcomes. However, a number of interventions will be adopted should they not provide the expected results or positive outcomes. One of them will be investigating the factors that contributed to the project’s failure. A root cause analysis will be performed to guide the identification of project issues that led to the failure and interventions needed to improve its outcomes. The second strategy would be prolonging the project duration; as new strategies are being implemented. Prolonging the duration will enable the team to implement new strategies, which may transform the outcomes of the project.
Plans to Maintain, Extend, Revise, and Discontinue the Proposed Solution
The outcomes of the project will guide the decisions to be made by the team involved in the process. For example, the project will be maintained if the analysis of data shows it to have positive effects on the organizational indicators of safety, quality, and efficiency. It will also be maintained if the analysis shows it to be highly feasible with a positive adoption response from the healthcare providers. The project will be extended if the project outcomes cannot be determined if effective or not. The extension will enable further determination of the effectiveness of the project in achieving its objectives. The project will be revised if found that its strategies do not align with its mission. It will be discontinued if found to increase the rates of medication errors among critically ill patients in the hospital.
Conclusion
Medication errors have adverse effects on the health of the patients. It predisposes them to unintended harm. It also increases the costs incurred by prolonging the hospital stay of patients. It also increases the operational costs in healthcare due to increased resource utilization in caring patients affected by the errors. Integrated electronic health records are effective in reducing and preventing medication administration errors. The reviewed evidence supports the use of the technology in promoting safety of patient care. Therefore, it is anticipated that enhanced care outcomes will be achieved with the use of the proposed intervention.
Assessment Description
For this assignment, you will synthesize the independent evidence-based practice project proposal assignments from NUR-550 and NUR-590 into a 4,500-5,000-word professional paper.
Final Paper
The final paper should:
- Incorporate all necessary revisions and corrections suggested by your instructors.
- Synthesize the different elements of the overall project into one paper. The synthesis should reflect the main concepts for each section, connect ideas or overreaching concepts, and be rewritten to include the critical aspects (do not copy and paste the assignments).
- Contain supporting research for the evidence-based practice project proposal.
Click here to ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT ON NUR 550 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final Paper
Main Body of the Paper
The main body of your paper should include the following sections:
- Problem Statement
- Organizational Culture and Readiness
- Literature Review
- Change Model, or Framework
- Implementation Plan
- Evaluation Plan
Appendices
The appendices at the end of your paper should include the following:
- All final changes or revisions for the drafts that will be included in the appendices of your paper.
- Complete the “APA Writing Checklist” to ensure that your paper adheres to APA style and formatting criteria and general guidelines for academic writing. Include the completed checklist as the final appendix at the end of your paper. In each preceding course you have been directed to the Student Success Center for assistance with APA style, and have submitted the APA Writing Checklist to help illustrate your adherence to APA style. This final paper should demonstrate a clear ability to communicate your project in a professional and accurately formatted paper using APA style. NUR 550 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final Paper
General Requirements
You are required to cite 10-12 peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Benchmark Information
This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:
MBA-MSN; MSN-Nursing Education; MSN Acute Care Nurse Practitioner-Adult-Gerontology; MSN Family Nurse Practitioner; MSN-Health Informatics; MSN-Health Care Quality and Patient Safety; MSN-Leadership in Health Care Systems; MSN-Public Health Nursing
1.1: Translate research and knowledge gained from practice, while adhering to ethical research standards, to improve patient outcomes and clinical practice.
5.1: Design ethically sound, evidence-based solutions to complex health care issues related to individuals, populations, and systems of care.
Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final Paper – Rubric
Synthesis
Criteria Description
Synthesis Paragraphs are logically sequenced, connect ideas or overreaching concepts, and are rewritten to present a fluid and cohesive paper. NUR 550 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final Paper
5. 5: Excellent
12 points
Synthesis is excellent. The paper organizes paragraphs in a logical sequence and connects ideas or overreaching concepts. The paper is well-developed, fluid, and cohesive.
4. 4: Good
11.04 points
Synthesis is evident. The paper organizes paragraphs in a logical sequence and connects ideas or overreaching concepts. Overall, the paper applies transitions and the paper is fluid and cohesive.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
Synthesis is generally evident. The paper organizes most paragraphs in a logical sequence and generally connects ideas or overreaching concepts. Some paragraphs require better transitions to create a fluid and cohesive paper. NUR 550 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final Paper
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
Synthesis is sporadic. Overall, the paper fails to organize paragraphs in a logical sequence and connect ideas or overreaching concepts in a fluid and cohesive paper.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Synthesis is not evident. The paper consists of a cut-and-paste of the previous assignments. Revision based on instructor feedback is not included.
Organizational Culture and Readiness
Criteria Description
Organizational Culture and Readiness Culture, degree of readiness, challenges to implementation, strategies for implementation, stakeholder involvement, communication strategies. NUR 550 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final Paper
5. 5: Excellent
10.5 points
The organizational culture and readiness are thoroughly discussed and insight into the organization challenges is presented. Clear strategies for communication, stakeholder involvement, and the implementation of the evidence-based practice project proposal are presented. Thorough explanations and strong supporting evidence are provided.
4. 4: Good
9.66 points
The organizational culture and readiness are discussed and information on the organizational challenges is presented. Strategies for communication, stakeholder involvement, and the implementation of the evidence-based practice project proposal are presented. Adequate explanations and supporting evidence are provided. NUR 550 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final Paper
3. 3: Satisfactory
9.24 points
An incomplete description of the organizational culture, readiness, and some organizational challenges is presented. Strategies for the overall implementation of the evidence-based practice project proposal are incomplete.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
8.4 points
The organizational culture, readiness, and some organizational challenges, are summarized. General strategies for the overall implementation of the evidence-based practice project proposal is presented, but there are inaccuracies. Some additional information is needed.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
A description of the organizational culture and readiness is not included.
Problem Statement (B)
Criteria Description
Problem Statement (C5.1a)
5. 5: Excellent
12 points
The problem statement is consistent throughout the paper and concisely describes the issue using strong evidence-based support to rationalize and justify the problem.
4. 4: Good
11.04 points
The problem statement is consistent throughout the paper and describes the issue using evidence-based support to rationalize and justify the problem.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
The problem statement is mostly consistent throughout the paper and, in most instances, uses evidence-based support to rationalize and justify the problem.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
The problem statement is inconsistently presented throughout the paper. Evidence-based support to rationalize and justify the problem is missing in many aspects.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The problem statement is not used throughout the paper. In general, evidence-based support to rationalize and justify the problem is not provided.
Literature Review
Criteria Description
Literature Review
5. 5: Excellent
10.5 points
The supporting literature from the literature review is organized and synthesized strategically throughout the paper to provide convincing evidence. The main components of the articles are used to provide substantial rationale for how the research supports the PICOT. NUR 550 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final Paper
4. 4: Good
9.66 points
The supporting literature from the literature review is used throughout most of the paper to provide evidence. The articles are used to provide general rationale for how the research supports the PICOT.
3. 3: Satisfactory
9.24 points
The supporting literature from the literature review is synthesized and used throughout the paper to provide evidence. The main components of the articles are used to provide rationale for how the research supports the PICOT.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
8.4 points
The supporting literature from the literature review is inconsistently used in the paper to provide evidence. The articles do not provide clear rationale for how the research supports the PICOT.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Supporting literature from the literature review is not evident. Clear rationale for how the research supports the PICOT is not presented.
Change Model or Framework
Criteria Description
Change Model or Framework
5. 5: Excellent
10.5 points
The selected model or framework and its application for the proposed implementation are thoroughly described.
4. 4: Good
9.66 points
The selected model or framework and its application for the key aspects of the proposed implementation are described.
3. 3: Satisfactory
9.24 points
The selected model or framework and its general application for implementation are outlined.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
8.4 points
The selected model or framework and its application for implementation are incomplete.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The selected model or framework and its application for implementation are not described.
Implementation Plan (B)
Criteria Description
Plan includes setting/access to subjects; timeline; budget and resources; research design; methods instruments; process for delivering intervention; stakeholders; barriers and challenges. (C5.1b)
5. 5: Excellent
10.5 points
The implementation plan is thoroughly described and provides the details for the various aspects. Thorough explanations and strong supporting evidence are provided.
4. 4: Good
9.66 points
The implementation plan is described and provides key information for the various aspects. Adequate explanations and supporting evidence are provided.
3. 3: Satisfactory
9.24 points
The implementation plan is generally described. Information for some key aspects is presented, but there are inaccuracies. Some additional information is needed.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
8.4 points
The implementation plan is incomplete.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The implementation plan is not described.
Evaluation Plan
Criteria Description
Evaluation Plan Plan includes expected outcomes, data collection tools, statistical test, methods applied to data collection tool, strategies for nonpositive outcomes, plans for maintaining, extending, revising and discontinuing proposed solution.
5. 5: Excellent
10.5 points
The evaluation plan is thoroughly described and provides the details for the various aspects. Thorough explanations and strong supporting evidence are provided.
4. 4: Good
9.66 points
The evaluation plan is described and provides key information for the various aspects. Adequate explanations and supporting evidence are provided.
3. 3: Satisfactory
9.24 points
The evaluation plan is generally described. Information for some key aspects is presented, but there are inaccuracies. Some additional information is needed.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
8.4 points
The evaluation plan is incomplete.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The evaluation plan is not described.
Associated Documents and Appendix
Criteria Description
Associated Documents and Appendix Appendix includes consent or approval form; timeline; budget and resource list; method or instrument; APA Writing Checklist.
5. 5: Excellent
9 points
The resources are accurate and attached in the appendix. It is clearly evident by the quality of the paper that the APA Writing Checklist was effectively used in development of the paper.
4. 4: Good
8.28 points
The resources are revised accordingly and attached in the appendix. It is apparent that the APA Writing Checklist was used in development of the paper.
3. 3: Satisfactory
7.92 points
The resources have been revised, but there are one or two minor errors. The resources are attached in the appendix. It is apparent that the APA Writing Checklist was generally used in development of the paper, but some aspects are inconsistent with the paper format or quality.
