NRS 429 Topic 3 Family Assessment Part II

March 8, 2022
Want your Assignment Done? Order NOw you can do it easy.

NRS 429 Topic 3 Family Assessment Part II

https://allnursingessays.com/nrs-429-topic-3-family-assessment-part-ii/

NRS 429 Topic 3 Family Assessment Part II

Family Health Assessment Part II

Write your introduction here.  First sentence needs to grab the audience’s attentions. The last sentence of the paragraph will be the Thesis Statement.  A thesis statement needs to be a clear and concise statement of the purpose.  What is the purpose of this paper?  You may write a simple statement such as:  This paper will be examining the ……..  Or maybe:  The purpose of this paper is to present ………  Check out this link to help you build a strong thesis statement.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:

https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/the_writing_process/thesis_statement_tips.html

Social Determinants of Health Affecting Family and Family Health Status

            In this section, you will be describing the Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) that affect the family health status.   (Remember to spell it out first, then you can use the abbreviation throughout the paper.)  This information needs to be relevant, accurately identified, and thoroughly described.  What is the impact of these SDOH on the family that was interviewed?  The direct impact to the family, and why the factors are prevalent to the family, are discussed in detail.  Discuss why these factors are prevalent for this family.  The discussion is well supported and illustrates insight into SDOH and their effect on the family health status.  Remember when the rubric states well supported, this means to use outside sources or references to build or illustrate your point.

Age-Appropriate Screening Recommendations

Based on the information gathered through the family health assessment, this section will be recommending age-appropriate screenings and highly relevant for each family member.  These screenings correlate to the information gathered through family health assessment.  Remember to present strong rational and support for your suggestions.

Assessment of Health Model

You will be choosing a health model to assist in creating a plan of action.  The health model selected needs to be thoroughly described.  Then, discuss the reasons why this health model is the best choice for this family.  These reasons are clearly outlined.  There needs to be strong rationale and support (references) provided to support your reasoning.

Application of Health Model

In this section, you will be using the model and outline the steps for a family-centered health promotion.   Create a relevant and viable family-centered health promotion.  The steps to achieve the desired outcome are described in detail.  The section must include appropriate strategies for communication with the family and are clearly presented.  The health promotion is well-designed and demonstrates an ability to assimilate findings and appropriately apply theoretical knowledge to achieve desired outcomes.

Conclusion

In the conclusion paragraph, provide a wrap-up of the information provided.

References

Falkner, A. (2018). Health promotion in nursing care. Health promotion: Health and wellness across the continuum. Retrieved from https://lc.gcumedia.com/nrs429vn/health-promotion-health-and-wellness-across-the-continuum/v1.1/#/chapter/2

(The above reference is an example to demonstrate the formatting and hanging indent.  This is for the chapter in our course materials.  If you do not use this reference in your paper, please delete.  There should be at least three references for this assignment.)

Description of the Assessment

Consider the interview and evaluation you conducted for the Topic 2 Family Health Assessment assignment. Determine the social determinants of health (SDOH) that contribute to the health of the family. Create a plan of action to incorporate health promotion strategies for this family in a 750-1,000 word paper. Include the following items:

Describe the SDOH that have an impact on the family’s health. What effect do these SDOH have on the family? Explain why these factors are so prevalent in this family.

Recommend age-appropriate screenings for each family member based on the information gathered during the family health assessment. Provide justification and support for your suggestions.

Select a health model to help you develop a plan of action. Describe the model you’ve chosen. Discuss why this health model is the best option for this family. Give an explanation for your reasoning.

Outline the steps for a family-centered health promotion using the model. Include communication strategies.

To complete this assignment, you must cite at least three peer-reviewed or scholarly sources. Sources must have been published within the last 5 years and be relevant to the assignment criteria.

Prepare this assignment in accordance with the APA Style Guide, which can be found in the Student Success Center.

This assignment makes use of a rubric. Please review the rubric before beginning the assignment to become acquainted with the requirements for successful completion.

You must turn in this assignment to LopesWrite. If you require assistance, a link to the LopesWrite technical support articles can be found in Course Resources.

Family Assessment Part II – Rubric

SDOH Affecting Family and Family Health Status

Criteria Description

SDOH Affecting Family and Family Health Status

5. Excellent

30 points

The SDOH directly affecting family health status are relevant, accurately identified and thoroughly described. The direct impact to the family, and why the factors are prevalent to the family, are discussed in detail. The discussion is well supported and illustrates insight into SDOH and their effect on family health status.

4. Good

26.7 points

The overall SDOH affecting family health status are accurately identified and described. The SDOH identified are relevant to the family. The direct impact to the family, and why the factors are prevalent to the family, are discussed.

3. Satisfactory

23.7 points

Key SDOH affecting family health status are summarized. The SDOH identified are relevant to the family. The direct impact to the family, and why the factors are prevalent to the family, are generally discussed. More support or rationale is needed in some areas.

2. Less than Satisfactory

22.5 points

SDOH affecting family health status are partially presented. SDOH listed are not relevant to the family. The direct impact to the family, and why the factors are prevalent to the family, are unclear. There are inaccuracies.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

SDOH affecting family health status, and the direct impact to the family, are not presented.

Age-Appropriate Screening Recommendations

Criteria Description

Age-Appropriate Screening Recommendations

5. Excellent

30 points

Screenings presented for each family member are age appropriate and highly relevant. Screenings correlate to the information gathered through family health assessment. Strong rationale and support is presented.

4. Good

26.7 points

Screenings presented for each family member are age appropriate. Screenings are relevant and based on the information gathered through family health assessment. Some minor rationale or support is needed.

3. Satisfactory

23.7 points

Screenings are presented for each family member. Screenings are generally age appropriate, but entirely not relevant based on the information gathered through family health assessment. More rationale and support is required.

2. Less than Satisfactory

22.5 points

Screenings are presented for some family members. The screenings are not age appropriate. Screenings are not relevant to the information gathered through family health assessment.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Age-appropriate screenings are not presented.

Assessment of Health Model

Criteria Description

Assessment of Health Model

5. Excellent

30 points

A health model is selected and thoroughly described. A detailed discussion of how the model will assist in creating a plan of action is presented. Reasons for why it is best for this family are clearly outlined. Strong rationale and support are provided to support reasoning.

4. Good

26.7 points

A health model is selected and described. A discussion of how the model will assist in creating a plan of action is presented. Reasons for why it is best for this family are provided. Some rationale or support is needed.

3. Satisfactory

23.7 points

A health model is selected and described. A summary of how the model will assist in creating a plan of action is presented. A general overview for why it is best for this family is provided. More rationale and support is required.

2. Less than Satisfactory

22.5 points

A health model is selected to assist in creating a plan of action. The description of the model is incomplete. It is unclear why the chosen model is best for this family.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A health model to assist in the creation of a plan of action is not presented. The model chosen is not a health model.

Application of Health Model

Criteria Description

Application of Health Model

5. Excellent

30 points

The health model is used to create a relevant and viable family-centered health promotion. The steps to achieve the desired outcome are described in detail. Appropriate strategies for communication with the family are clearly presented. The health promotion is well-designed and demonstrates an ability to assimilate findings and appropriately apply theoretical knowledge to achieve desired outcomes.

4. Good

26.7 points

The health model is used to create a relevant family-centered health promotion. The steps to achieve the desired outcome are illustrated. Strategies for communication with the family are presented.

3. Satisfactory

23.7 points

The health model is used to create a general family-centered health promotion. The steps to achieve the desired outcome require more detail to illustrate a clear plan of action. A general plan for communication with the family is presented. More rationale and support is required.

2. Less than Satisfactory

22.5 points

Steps for a family-centered health promotion are partially presented. The health promotion is not based on the health model. Significant aspects are missing. There are major inaccuracies.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Family-centered health promotion using selected health model is omitted.

Thesis Development and Purpose

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

5. Excellent

7.5 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

4. Good

6.68 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

3. Satisfactory

5.93 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

2. Less than Satisfactory

5.63 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Argument Logic and Construction

Criteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

5. Excellent

7.5 points

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

4. Good

6.68 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

3. Satisfactory

5.93 points

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

2. Less than Satisfactory

5.63 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Excellent

7.5 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good

6.68 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

3. Satisfactory

5.93 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

2. Less than Satisfactory

5.63 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Criteria Description

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5. Excellent

3 points

All format elements are correct.

4. Good

2.67 points

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

3. Satisfactory

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH ALL NURSING ESSAYS TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT  ordernowcc-blue

Posted in nursing by Clarissa