Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation NUR 590
Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation NUR 590
Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation NUR 590
Click here to ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT ON Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation NUR 590
Achieving patient safety implores nurses and other healthcare professionals to develop interventions that improve quality care and reduces occurrence of hospital acquired infections (HAIs). The use of evidence-based practice interventions like hand hygiene protocols and measures that include handwashing with soap and water alongside sanitizers can prevent and reduce the prevalence of hospital acquired infections (Zhao et al., 2017). Nurses in pediatric care settings should set high levels of hygiene to minimize the occurrence of HAIs in these settings. The integration of EBP interventions mitigates the increasing prevalence of HAIs and their associated cost burden to patients, their families and the health care system (Akanji et al., 2017). Hospital acquired infections constitute a significant part of the increased mortality and morbidity and poor outcomes among pediatric patients. The purpose of this presentation is to detail the evidence-based practice project proposal on hand hygiene measures involving handwashing with soap and water alongside use of hand sanitizer by healthcare workers, especially nurses, in reducing and preventing the occurrence of hospital acquired infections in pediatric care settings.
Evidence-based practice continues to be a critical component of enhancing care delivery among patients in different settings. The use of EBP entails incorporation of research evidence together with patient preferences and clinician’s care experience. Evidence-based practice aims at optimization of provider and team behavior to support changes in patient conduct to attain quality care, and provides education to reduce the risks of hospital acquired infections and improve different aspects of care provision (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019). EBP also encourages the use of resources and services, and improvement in patients and their families’ satisfaction (Zhao et al., 2018). The EBP project will also focus on enhancing patient safety, improving adherence to hand hygiene measures, and improving outcomes and quality management to reduce adverse events. The project also focuses on decreasing the overall cost of infections, length of stay, and readmissions, and ensure that providers can make better care decisions in managing adverse events resulting from HAIs. The PICOT Question for the project is
Among healthcare worker in pediatric settings (P), how does handwashing with soap and water alongside hand sanitizer (I), compared to handwashing with soap and water alone (C), reduce hospital acquired infections (O), with six months (T)?
Organizational culture is an essential part of implementing change as it mirrors values, mission, and vision and employee perception to adopting new ways of doing things. A decentralized and hierarchical culture where employees get involved in decision-making and has robust values and norms leads to effective implementation of EBP project proposal. The proposed structure enhances employee motivation and diversification. Decentralization improves communication and ensures implementation of new approaches to doing things to enhance quality care (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019). Organizations ready to implement the proposed EBP interventions should focus on patient-centered care and health promotion to save lives in pediatric settings.
The project uses the Organizational Capacity Assessment Tool (OCAT) developed by the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). The tool assesses overall readiness to enhance health interventions in organizations. The tool identifies substantive capacities and strengths that exist and the need for more to attain expected outcomes. Implementing the proposed EBP requires organizations to have capabilities and resources with a superb culture based on their mission, purpose and best values. Threats to readiness include need for resources to implement the project and technologies to reduce HAIs. Teamwork leads to effective flow of information to implement the project and attain expected outcomes.
Assessment Description
For this assignment, develop a professional presentation that could be disseminated to a professional group of your peers.
The dissemination of an evidence-based practice project proposal is an important part of the final project. Dissemination of your project to a local association or clinical site/practice informs important stakeholders of evidence-based interventions that can improve clinical practice and ultimately patient outcomes.
Include the following in your presentation:
- Introduction (include PICOT statement)
- Organizational Culture and Readiness
- Problem Statement and Literature Review
- Change Model, or Framework
- Implementation Plan
- Evaluation Plan
- Conclusion
Create a 12- to 15-slide PowerPoint presentation outlining your evidence-based practice project proposal. Create 100-250 word speaker notes for each slide. Loom can be used to produce a voice-over or a video for your PowerPoint presentation. For more information on recording your presentation with Loom, see the topic Resources. Include an extra slide for the Loom link at the start and another for References at the conclusion. Consider your unique approach and tone throughout the recorded presentation.
A project proposal for evidence-based practice can be distributed in two ways: internally or externally. EBP findings
are disseminated to a large public healthcare or clinical research population by communicating data and actions. The fundamental purpose of dissemination is to develop and promote evidence-based solutions in order to improve patient experience and implementation. One internal technique for propagating evidence-based practice is the hospital board. The hospital board is made up of health-care workers like nurses, doctors, and other professionals involved in patient care. When disseminating the EBP, face-to-face communication with the hospital board is the ideal option. During questioning sessions, the technique fosters participation and fast answer (M, 2019). Presenting at professional organization conferences, such as the American Nurses Association, is an external technique. The professional association would be an ideal place for communicating with a large number of nurses. Face-to-face consultation and conversation with other nursing specialists would be used in the conference. Internal and exterior communication channels would be distinct.
Also Check Out: NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Evaluation Plan
Individuals who care about or are interested in hospital initiatives are known as stakeholders. A stakeholder is the project sponsor, who is usually an executive in the management system. A management system is a collection of people who provide resources and enforce project decisions. Stakeholders include clients, freelancers, manufacturers, and even the government (Watt, 2018). Stakeholders include the project manager, project team members, and managers from various business divisions. A project has both internal and external stakeholders. Internal stakeholders include top management, project team members, the boss, colleagues, the resource manager, and internal customers. External stakeholders include customers, the government, contractors and subcontractors, and suppliers.
M, J. (2019, May 27). Dissemination of evidence-based practice project results in nursing. The Nursing Ace; The Nursing Ace. https://thenursingace.com/dissemination-of-evidence-based-practice-project-results-in-nursing/
Watt, A. (2018, August 15). 5. Stakeholder Management – Project Management. Opentextbc.ca. https://opentextbc.ca/projectmanagement/chapter/chapter-5-project-stakeholders-project-management/
RESPOND HERE (150 WORDS, 2 REFERENCES)
This is very intriguing. Carolee, most healthcare institutions are now implementing evidence-based practice to improve the quality of healthcare outcomes. Disseminating evidence-based practices entails spreading research findings or evidence-based practices. In various organizations, disseminating evidence-based practices takes various forms (M, J., 2019). Stakeholder participation is one of the most effective methods of disseminating evidence-based practices. Stakeholders have a large impact or influence on the spread of evidence-based practices. For example, they can pioneer new approaches to incorporating research findings or evidence-based practices into actual healthcare processes. Sponsors, the community, other healthcare organizations with similar interests, and governmental institutions frequently assist in the dissemination of evidence-based practices. Internal stakeholders include employees, management, patients, and healthcare professionals such as doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and physicians (Warren et al., 2021). The success of evidence-based practice is dependent on all stakeholders contributing positively.
References
M, J. (2019, May 27). Dissemination of evidence-based practice project results in nursing. The Nursing Ace; The Nursing Ace. https://thenursingace.com/dissemination-of-evidence-based-practice-project-results-in-nursing/
Warren, A. M., Constantinides, S. V., Blake, C. E., & Frongillo, E. A. (2021). Advancing knowledge about stakeholder engagement in multisectoral nutrition research. Global Food Security, 29. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100521
You are required to cite a minimum of six peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation NUR 590
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) established an Institutional Review Board (IRB) to review and monitor human subjects translational research. The IRB is responsible for a variety of tasks, including approving or rejecting research proposals (Nurunnabi, 2014). For example, in order for a study to be approved by the IRB, certain ethical requirements, such as informed consent, scientific validity, fair subject selection, subject respect, and many others, must be met. If the research does not meet IRB requirements, the study may be rejected or the design modified. Furthermore, the IRB has been tasked with training investigators on how to protect human subjects from harm during research (Nurunnabi, 2014). Furthermore, before investigators submit research proposals for funding, the IRB must review the proposals to ensure that ethical principles are followed. Among the ethical research considerations specific to population health are fidelity, nonmaleficence, and beneficence (DeCamp et al., 2018). Fidelity entails an individual’s respect, trust, and autonomy, which the investigator should consider before beginning the research. Non-maleficence implies that the study should not harm human subjects, whereas beneficence implies that the study should act in the patients’ best interests (DeCamp et al., 2018).
Indeed, investigators must ensure that people, potential benefits, and the burden of the research are all respected, and that justice is upheld throughout the translation process. Individuals, for example, should be treated as autonomous subjects with the right to absolute safety. Investigators must ensure that the research is conducted in the best interests of the patients and that the results will benefit population health. Once again, research costs should be reasonable and affordable. Following the research, the research benefits should be distributed fairly and equitably to participants. When an investigator takes all of these factors into account, the research is ethically balanced.
3. 3: Satisfactory
15.84 points
The problem statement is consistent throughout the presentation and concisely describes the issue using strong evidence-based support from the literature review to rationalize and justify the problem. The research from the literature review is current, relevant, and used to provide excellent rationale and support throughout. Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation NUR 590
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
14.4 points
The problem statement outlines the issue. Support from the research from the literature review is inconsistent.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The problem statement is not clearly stated. Research from the literature review is not included.
Change Model or Framework
Criteria Description
Change Model or Framework
5. 5: Excellent
12 points
The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are thoroughly described.
4. 4: Good
11.04 points
The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are adequately described.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are generally described.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
The selected model or framework is and its application to the proposed implementation are only partially described.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are not described.
Implementation Plan
Criteria Description
Implementation Plan
5. 5: Excellent
12 points
The implementation plan is thoroughly described and provides the details for the various aspects.
4. 4: Good
11.04 points
The implementation plan is generally described and provides an overall outline for the various aspects.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
The implementation plan is adequately described and provides the details for the various aspects.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
The implementation plan is not described.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The implementation plan is only partially described.
Evaluation Plan
Criteria Description
Evaluation Plan
5. 5: Excellent
12 points
The evaluation plan is thoroughly described and provides the details for the various aspects.
4. 4: Good
11.04 points
The evaluation plan is adequately described and provides key information for the various aspects.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
The evaluation plan is outlined and provides general information for most aspects.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
The evaluation plan is only partially described.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The evaluation plan is not described.
Conclusion
Criteria Description
Conclusion
5. 5: Excellent
6 points
The conclusion is short, clear and summarizes the key points of the presentation in a powerful and memorable way.
4. 4: Good
5.52 points
The conclusion summarizes the key points of the presentation in a concise manner.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
The conclusion outlines the broad aspects of the presentation.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
The conclusion mentions some aspects of the presentation, but there are some key aspects missing.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
A conclusion is not presented.
Research
Criteria Description
Research
5. 5: Excellent
6 points
Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive. Addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation NUR 590
4. 4: Good
5.52 points
Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
No outside sources were used to support the assignment.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, or timeliness.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Few outside sources were used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent.
Presentation
Criteria Description
Presentation PowerPoint, speaker notes, Loom voice over or video.
5. 5: Excellent
12 points
The submission is presented effectively, and all of the required elements creatively contribute to the presentation of the concepts.
4. 4: Good
11.04 points
The submission is presented effectively and contains all of the required elements.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
The submission contains minor inconsistencies that are not overly distracting. Presentation contains a majority of the required elements.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
The submission is ineffective, contains multiple inconsistencies, or is missing a few of the required elements.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The submission is incoherent, contains major inconsistencies, is not presented effectively, or is missing a substantial amount of the required elements. Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation NUR 590
Aesthetic Quality
